← Back to Home
Technical Deep Dive

How Does Agentic AI Work?

Architecture, Components, and Mechanisms Explained

Last updated: January 202622 min read

Key Takeaways

  • Agentic AI operates through a Perceive → Reason → Plan → Act → Learn continuous loop that enables autonomous task execution
  • The architecture consists of six core modules: Perception, Reasoning Engine, Planning, Memory, Action/Tools, and Orchestration
  • Memory systems (short-term and long-term) enable context retention across sessions and continuous learning from outcomes
  • Popular frameworks like LangGraph, CrewAI, and AutoGen implement these patterns with different architectural approaches

AGENTIC AI ARCHITECTURE ADOPTION 2026

$10.9B
Agentic AI market 2026
67%
Fortune 500 deployment
340%
YoY adoption growth
1.3B
Projected AI agents by 2028

Sources: Precedence Research, Axis Intelligence

Overview: The Agentic AI System

An agentic AI architecture is a system design that transforms passive large language models (LLMs) into autonomous, goal-oriented agents capable of reasoning, planning, and taking action with minimal human intervention. If you're new to this concept, start with our guide on what agentic AI is. Unlike traditional AI that provides single-turn responses, an agentic architecture orchestrates a continuous feedback loop that allows the AI to adapt and execute complex, multi-step tasks.

The Fundamental Principle

"Agentic systems operate across three logical layers: Tool, Reasoning, and Action. Each layer has a specific role in enabling the agent to retrieve, process, and act on information effectively."

IBM - Agentic Architecture

According to AWS Prescriptive Guidance, modern agentic AI extends LLMs with an orchestration layer that manages control flow, tool invocation, and state across multi-step execution. This transforms a stateless model into a stateful, goal-pursuing system.

The Core Loop: Perceive-Reason-Plan-Act-Learn

At the heart of every agentic AI system is a cognitive loop known as the Perceive–Reason–Plan–Act–Learn cycle. This loop enables an intelligent agent to understand their environment, apply logic to make decisions, act on those decisions, and learn from the outcomes to improve future performance.

Agentic AI Architecture Diagram

LLM Brain
AI
Perceive
Reason
Plan
Act
Learn
Continuous feedback loop

Source: Architecture pattern based on Amplework - Agentic AI Loops and Exabeam Architecture Guide

The Five Stages Explained

1. Perceive

The agent gathers data from its environment using sensors, APIs, or other input sources. This includes natural language processing (NLP) for text, computer vision for images, and API calls for structured data. The perception process performs feature extraction, object recognition, and semantic interpretation to create a meaningful model of the current situation.

Inputs: User queries, documents, database responses, sensor data, API responses

2. Reason

The reasoning engine—typically powered by an LLM—processes perceived information to evaluate potential actions. This involves logical analysis, probabilistic inference, and drawing conclusions from the knowledge base. The LLM applies chain-of-thought reasoning to understand context and formulate potential solutions.

Process: Context evaluation, inference, deduction, pattern matching

3. Plan

The planning module breaks high-level business objectives into small, executable steps. It designs dependencies, sequences tasks, and determines what needs to happen in what order. Plans can be hierarchical, with a "planner agent" orchestrating tasks across multiple "worker agents."

Output: Task decomposition, action sequence, resource allocation, contingency plans

4. Act

The action module executes the plan by interfacing with either digital or physical environments. This includes calling external tools like APIs, writing code, sending emails, updating databases, or controlling devices. The execution module tracks task status, checks for failures, and revises plans when conditions change.

Tools: API calls, code execution, database queries, file operations, external services

5. Learn

The feedback loop allows the agent to evaluate outcomes and learn from successes and failures. Using reinforcement signals, self-reflective evaluation, or human feedback, the system refines its internal models and strategies. This enables continuous improvement over time.

Mechanisms: Outcome evaluation, strategy refinement, knowledge base updates, model adaptation

Architecture Components Deep Dive

According to Exabeam's architectural analysis, agentic AI systems are built on several core modules that work together to enable autonomous operation:

Perception Module

The perception module is the agent's sensory system that gathers and interprets data from the environment. It uses technologies like natural language processing (NLP), computer vision, and APIs to process various data types.

Key Functions

  • • Feature extraction from raw inputs
  • • Object/event recognition
  • • Semantic interpretation
  • • Context modeling

Data Sources

  • • Natural language input
  • • Structured databases
  • • External APIs
  • • Sensor/IoT data

Reasoning Engine (LLM Brain)

The reasoning engine is the "brain" of the agent, typically powered by a large language model (LLM). It processes perceived information and knowledge to make intelligent decisions and inferences, drawing logical conclusions from facts and patterns.

How it works: If a rule states "IF A AND B THEN C," and the agent perceives A and B, it can infer C. This extends to complex chains of reasoning across multiple domains and knowledge sources.

Inference
Logical deduction
Analysis
Context evaluation
Prediction
Outcome modeling

Planning Module

The planning module breaks high-level objectives into executable steps. According to Kore.ai, the planner designs dependencies, sequences tasks, and ensures actions are explainable and aligned with business logic.

Planning ApproachDescriptionBest For
Fixed PlanningPlan created upfront before executionPredictable tasks
Adaptive PlanningPlan evolves with environmental feedbackDynamic environments
HierarchicalNested sub-plans with delegationComplex workflows

Action Module (Tool Integration)

AI agents become truly actionable only when they can interact with enterprise systems. APIs let agents trigger transactions, fetch data, update workflows, and connect with CRMs, ERPs, HR systems, or cloud platforms.

🔗
API Calls
💾
Database Ops
📧
Communications
⚙️
Code Execution

Orchestration Layer

The orchestration layer coordinates communication between all modules, managing overall control flow, handling iterations, errors, and new information. According to Communications of the ACM, without orchestration, agents remain siloed—unable to share memory, coordinate efforts, or adapt dynamically.

A strong orchestration platform enables: Memory and state management for long-running workflows, task decomposition and parallelization, fine-grained access control, and dynamic model selection based on context.

Memory Systems: Short-Term and Long-Term

Memory is a crucial component for maintaining context across interactions. According to IBM's analysis of AI agent memory, agentic AI introduces layered memory systems that persist across time, contexts, and agents—enabling continuity, learning, and adaptation.

Short-Term Memory

Provides temporary storage for context and state during task execution. Allows the agent to maintain continuity across multiple steps without losing track of immediate objectives.

Key Functions:

  • • Context retention within sessions
  • • Conversation history maintenance
  • • Task progress tracking
  • • Intermediate result storage

Challenge: As interactions extend, transcript replay inflates cost and latency, making early mistakes harder to recover from.

Long-Term Memory

Stores historical data including previously executed actions, outcomes, and environmental observations. Enables agents to retain learned behaviors and apply insights across different contexts.

Key Functions:

  • • Knowledge base storage
  • • Vector store embeddings
  • • Knowledge graph relationships
  • • Cross-session learning

Technology: Often implemented using vector databases and knowledge graphs for efficient retrieval.

The Memory Scaling Challenge

According to AI News, as foundation models scale toward trillions of parameters and context windows reach millions of tokens, the computational cost of remembering history is rising faster than the ability to process it. Organizations face a bottleneck where the sheer volume of "long-term memory" (Key-Value cache) overwhelms existing hardware architectures.

Orchestration and Multi-Agent Coordination

In a multi-agent system (MAS) architecture, multiple independent agents—each powered by language models—collaborate to tackle complex tasks. Unlike single-agent systems where one agent handles everything, MAS leverages each agent's unique roles, personas, and tools to enhance efficiency and decision-making.

Multi-Agent Architecture Pattern

Orchestrator
Research Agent
Data gathering
Coding Agent
Implementation
Review Agent
Quality assurance

Advantages of Multi-Agent

  • Scalability: Add agents without significant redesign
  • Fault tolerance: If one fails, others continue
  • Specialization: Each agent optimized for its role
  • Parallelization: Multiple tasks simultaneously

Considerations

  • Coordination overhead: Managing communication
  • Consistency: Shared state management
  • Debugging: Tracing across agents
  • Cost: Multiple LLM calls

Key Design Patterns: ReAct, Plan-Execute, and More

According to IBM's research on ReAct agents, several key design patterns have emerged for building effective agentic AI systems. These patterns define how agents reason, plan, and execute tasks.

ReAct (Reasoning + Acting)

First introduced by Yao et al. in 2023, ReAct combines chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning with external tool use. The agent operates in a continuous Thought → Action → Observation loop for step-by-step problem-solving.

The ReAct Loop:

1Thought
2Action
3Observation
Repeat

Strengths

  • • Grounds reasoning in real-world feedback
  • • Reduces hallucination risk
  • • Improved interpretability
  • • Incremental decision-making

Challenges

  • • Non-deterministic outputs
  • • Potential infinite loops
  • • Higher API costs from iterations

Source: Salesforce ReAct Guide, Prompt Engineering Guide

Plan-and-Execute

Unlike ReAct's incremental approach, Plan-and-Execute creates a complete plan upfront before execution. According to By AI Team's analysis, this pattern is better suited for tasks requiring reliability and consistency.

AspectReActPlan-and-Execute
PlanningIncremental, step-by-stepComplete plan upfront
AdaptabilityHigh—adjusts each stepLower—replans if needed
ConsistencyVariableHigher—structured approach
Best ForDynamic, exploratory tasksWell-defined workflows

Reflection Pattern

Agent evaluates its own outputs, identifies errors, and self-corrects. Improves quality through iterative refinement.

Use case: Code review, content improvement

Tool Use Pattern

Agent determines which external tools to use and how to use them to accomplish tasks effectively.

Use case: API integration, database queries

Human-in-the-Loop

Agent pauses at critical decision points to get human approval before proceeding with high-stakes actions.

Use case: Financial transactions, deployments

Multi-Agent Collaboration

Multiple specialized agents work together, with clear leadership and task division across the team.

Use case: Complex research, software development

Popular Frameworks Compared

Several frameworks have emerged to implement agentic AI architectures. According to DataCamp's comprehensive comparison, each framework takes a different architectural approach suited to different use cases. For an in-depth look at framework options, see our agentic AI frameworks guide.

FrameworkArchitectureBest ForLearning Curve
LangGraph
by LangChain
Graph-based workflows with nodes and edgesComplex decision pipelines, branching logicSteeper
CrewAI
Role-based
Team metaphor with role-defined agentsRapid prototyping, structured workflowsBeginner-friendly
AutoGen
by Microsoft
Conversational agents, dynamic role-playingEnterprise deployment, human-in-the-loopModerate
Semantic Kernel
by Microsoft
Plugin-based with semantic functionsEnterprise integration, .NET/C# ecosystemsModerate

Sources: Latenode Comparison, Turing AI Agent Frameworks, Codecademy Guide

LangGraph

Uses nodes (functions), edges (execution flow), and stateful graphs (persistent data). Ideal for complex decision pipelines with conditional branching.

Typical use: 5-20+ agents in complex workflows

CrewAI

Introduces "Crews and Flows" design pattern. A Crew is a collection of role-defined agents plus tasks, with sequential or parallel execution.

Typical use: 3-10 agents in structured teams

AutoGen

Emphasizes natural language interactions and dynamic role-playing. v0.4 supports asynchronous architecture for scaling larger teams.

Typical use: 2-5 agents in conversational flows

Architecture Types: Reactive, Deliberative, Cognitive

According to Vectorize.io's architectural analysis, three broad categories of agent architectures are commonly referenced: Reactive, Deliberative, and Cognitive. While these originated in classical AI theory, they map well onto modern LLM agent designs.

Reactive Architecture

Maps situations directly to actions without deeper reasoning or internal planning. Simple stimulus-response behavior based on predefined rules or learned mappings.

Strengths: Fast response, predictable, low computational cost
Limitations: Cannot handle novel situations, no long-term planning

Deliberative Architecture

Maintains an internal model of the world and uses reasoning to plan actions. Considers goals, evaluates options, and formulates multi-step plans before acting.

Strengths: Goal-directed, handles complex tasks, adaptable
Limitations: Slower response, higher computational requirements

Cognitive Architecture

The most advanced category, aiming to emulate human-like cognition. Combines perception, reasoning, memory, learning, and meta-cognition (reasoning about reasoning).

Strengths: Most capable, learns and improves, handles ambiguity
Limitations: Most complex to build, highest resource requirements

Modern Reality: Most production agentic AI systems are hybrids, combining reactive responses for simple queries with deliberative planning for complex tasks. Research from Nature Communications shows that brain-inspired modular architectures—where specialized LLM modules interact like cognitive systems—are showing promise for improved planning capabilities.

Implementation Considerations

Building production-ready agentic AI systems requires careful attention to several factors. Based on research from Akka's enterprise guide and Microsoft's Agent Framework, here are the key considerations:

Best Practices

  • Well-defined system prompts
    Clear instructions and constraints for agent behavior
  • Clear task division
    Distinct roles and responsibilities for each agent
  • Dedicated reasoning phases
    Separate planning, execution, and evaluation stages
  • Human or agentic feedback
    Checkpoints for validation and course correction
  • Intelligent message filtering
    Reduce noise and focus on relevant context

Common Pitfalls

  • ×
    Unbounded loops
    Agents running indefinitely without termination conditions
  • ×
    Context window overflow
    Losing important context as conversations grow
  • ×
    Tool call failures
    Inadequate error handling for external services
  • ×
    Cost explosion
    Unexpected API costs from iterative loops
  • ×
    Hallucination propagation
    Errors compounding through multi-step workflows

Summary: How Agentic AI Systems Work

CORE ARCHITECTURE

Agentic AI systems transform LLMs into autonomous agents through the Perceive-Reason-Plan-Act-Learn loop, enabling continuous task execution with minimal human oversight.

KEY COMPONENTS

Perception Module, Reasoning Engine (LLM), Planning Module, Action/Tool Integration, Memory Systems (short and long-term), and Orchestration Layer.

DESIGN PATTERNS

ReAct (reasoning + acting), Plan-and-Execute, Reflection, Tool Use, and Multi-Agent Collaboration—each suited for different task types and requirements.

FRAMEWORKS

LangGraph (graph-based), CrewAI (role-based teams), AutoGen (conversational), and Semantic Kernel (enterprise) offer different architectural approaches.

Build With Agentic AI Architecture

At Planetary Labour, we're implementing cutting-edge agentic AI architectures to create autonomous digital workers. Our systems leverage the perceive-reason-act loop to handle complex tasks with human-like adaptability.

Explore Planetary Labour →

Continue Learning